Dr Justin Wong Awarded by the Australian Academy of Science

The Australian Academy of Science have announced their latest awards for outstanding contributions to science with 20 of Australia’s leading scientists receiving a 2019 honorific award.

Dr Justin Wong, a past recipient of  a Cure The Future Fellowship has been recognised for his work in gene expression and its applications in cancer therapies having been awarded the 2019 Ruth Stephens Gani Medal.

Watch the Video About the Award

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/gDvjJOG7k7A" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Dr Wong, then a research officer, received the inaugural Cure The Future Fellowship which provided salary support for 18 months.

Support from Cure The Future has provided Dr.Wong the ability to embark on a project to discover novel mechanisms that regulates gene expression in normal and cancer cells. Over the past 9 years, since receiving the Cure The Future Fellowship, Dr Wong has made many journal contributions and research breakthroughs have resulted in over $5 million dollars in grant funding for more research to find ways to combat cancers.

Every junior researcher requires start up funding to achieve scientific excellence. I am forever grateful to Cure The Future for providing this in the first 2 years of my postdoctoral research. I am a living testimony that Cure The Future contributes towards building the career of a young researcher like myself.  Justin Wong

Since receiving the Cure The Future support, Dr. Wong has progressed on to become an independent laboratory head at the Centenary Institute focusing on understanding mechanisms that regulate gene expression and how mistakes in these processes cause cancers.

Congratulations from Cure The Future.

Do you want to help more researchers like Justin?

Your support could help cure the future of thousands of Australians.

Trump plan threatens Australian Drug Safety

Sydney Morning Herald | 9 March 2017

Trump plans threaten to weaken Australia’s drug safety regime

by Marcus Strom | Science Editor
Drug safety and regulation in Australia are under threat from US President Donald Trump, says leading Australian doctor John Rasko.

Professor Rasko, with two international colleagues from Japan and Canada, has penned a comment article in the journal Nature, published on Thursday, calling for the US Food and Drug Administration to continue regulation of pharmaceuticals for both efficacy and safety.

In January, Mr Trump told pharmaceutical industry executives: ‘‘We’re going to be cutting regulations at a level that nobody’s seen before.’’ Professor Rasko, who is head of cell and molecular therapies at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and affiliated with the University of Sydney, said: ‘‘The most extreme proponents of deregulation say the market should be the sole arbiter of utility: if a medicine sells well, then it must be safe and effective. ‘‘If these sorts of changes go through, I can see a world in 10 years where the snake-oil salesman is back. It will all come down to marketing.’’

Mr Trump is vetting candidates for FDA commissioner. According to The New York Times, one candidate is Jim O’Neill, a former official at the US Health and Human Services Department. At a conference on ageing in 2014, Mr O’Neill spoke in favour of ‘‘progressive approval’’ for drugs, which would see pharmaceuticals proved safe for use, but not shown to be effective for treatment. Mr O’Neill said: ‘‘We should reform the FDA so it is approving drugs after their sponsors have demonstrated safety. Then let people start using them at their own risk.’’

Professor Rasko has responded to what he regards as a global

health threat. The authors say re- laxing the FDA’s regulatory system will subject patients to drugs that might be toxic.

‘‘All nations should take note – weaker standards for entry of drugs onto the US market will harm health everywhere,’’ Professor Rasko and colleagues write.

Professor Rasko told Fairfax Media the regulator in Australia, the Therapeutics Goods Administration, is fiercely independent. However, he said the FDA had a dramatic effect on the rollout of pharmaceuticals here. ‘‘The size and scope in the US in terms of population and money available means we rely on many of their studies,’’ he said.

The TGA and FDA maintain a memorandum of understanding whereby, among other things, both regulators are committed to ex- change information concerning ‘adverse health consequences’ of drugs.

‘‘No company would spend the tens of millions of dollars required to show that their drugs are effective if they aren’t required to,’’ Professor Rasko said.

A spokesman for federal Health Minister Greg Hunt said: ‘‘The TGA is acknowledged internationally as a first-rank regulator and has robust safeguards in place to ensure the safety of the Australian public. It will continue to be the government’s first line of defence in the regulation of medicines.’’

Prof John Rasko warns of US deregulation risks

Donald Trump’s FDA plans could affect drug regulation in Australia

by Marcus Strom

Sydney Morning Herald 9th March 2017

Drug safety and regulation in Australia are under threat from US President Donald Trump, says leading Australian doctor John Rasko.

Professor Rasko, with two international colleagues from Japan and Canada, has penned a comment article in the journal Nature published on Thursday calling for the US Food and Drug Administration to continue regulation of pharmaceuticals for both efficacy and safety as President Trump talks of the need to reduce drug prices by streamlining the FDA approval process for new medicines, and bringing drug makers back to the United States.

In January, Mr Trump told pharmaceutical industry executives: “We’re going to be cutting regulations at a level that nobody’s seen before.”

Professor Rasko, who is head of cell and molecular therapies at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and affiliated with the University of Sydney, said: “The most extreme proponents of deregulation say the market should be the sole arbiter of utility: if a medicine sells well, then it must be safe and effective.”Professor John Rasko, head of cell and molecular therapies at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital.

He told Fairfax Media: “If these sorts of changes go through, I can see a world in 10 years where the snake-oil salesman is back. It will all come down to marketing.”

Mr Trump is vetting candidates for FDA commissioner. According to The New York Times, one candidate is Jim O’Neill, a former official at the US Health and Human Services Department.

At a conference on ageing in 2014, Mr O’Neill spoke in favour of “progressive approval” for drugs, which would see pharmaceuticals proved safe for use, but not shown to be effective for treatment.

Mr O’Neill said: “We should reform FDA so it is approving drugs after their sponsors have demonstrated safety. Then let people start using them at their own risk.”

Professor Robyn Ward from the University of Queensland is chairman of the Commonwealth Medical Services Advisory Committee. Photo: Louie Douvis

Professor Rasko has responded to what he regards as a global health threat. The authors say relaxing the FDA’s regulatory system will subject patients to drugs that might be toxic.

“All nations should take note – weaker standards for entry of drugs onto the US market will harm health everywhere,” Professor Rasko and colleagues write

Professor Rasko told Fairfax Media that the regulator in Australia, the Therapeutic Goods Administration, is fiercely independent. However, he said the FDA had a dramatic effect on the rollout of pharmaceuticals here.

“The size and scope in the US in terms of population and money available means we rely on many of their studies,” he said.

The TGA and FDA maintain a memorandum of understanding whereby, among other things, both regulators are committed to exchange information concerning “adverse health consequences” of drugs.

Professor Rasko said the removal of US-based studies would have an economic and health impact.

“No company would spend the tens of millions of dollars required to show that their drugs are effective if they aren’t required to,” he said.

These arguments are largely supported by Professor Robyn Ward, deputy vice-chancellor of the University of Queensland. Professor Ward is also chairman of the Commonwealth Medical Services Advisory Committee and a member of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee.

“The world relies on the collaboration of many countries for drug regulation,” Professor Ward said. “Removing a country as large as the US would slow down progress and scientific advance.”

Professor Terry Campbell, who is is head of the department of medicine at St Vincent’s Hospital, said he was “inclined to agree with” the authors of the Nature article but noted “there is still a strong public health lobby in the US”.

“Trials will still happen. Big cancer drugs won’t be bought if they aren’t proven effective.”

Professor Campbell, who sat on the PBAC for 16 years to February this year, also said that even if the FDA changed its regulatory stance, “I can see no way that the Europeans would allow marketing without proving efficacy”.

However, he said: “Any shift in this direction from the FDA would make life a lot more difficult.”

Professor Ward warned that FDA deregulation could squeeze out the smaller medical companies.

“Smaller companies offering innovative solutions could have less traction because they have smaller marketing budgets than the big pharmaceutical companies,” she said.

“It will be a race to the bottom. Market forces would drive prices up based on popularity, not efficacy.”

Professor Rasko in Nature argued that “unregulated markets are hopeless at sifting out futile drugs”. “Witness the multibillion-dollar industries in homeopathy and other pseudo-medicines,” the authors say.

Professor Rasko said: “Rigorous clinical studies are still the best way to learn whether a drug works and regulation is essential to ensure that these studies are conducted.”

A spokesman for federal Health Minister Greg Hunt said: “The TGA is acknowledged internationally as a first-rank regulator and has robust safeguards in place to ensure the safety of the Australian public.

“It will continue to be the government’s first line of defence in the regulation of medicines.”

The Nature article was jointly written by Douglas Sipp from the Riken Centre for Developmental Biology in Japan, Christopher McCabe, a health economist at the University of Alberta in Canada, and Professor Rasko.

Read the article at Sydney Morning Herald smh.com.au

Phil Gould becomes CTF Ambassador

Cure The Future are pleased to announce that NRL Legend and Penrith Panthers boss Phillip Gould AM has agreed to become an Ambassador.

Phil already has an association with the charity, having spoken at a number of events including the recent ‘Bringing the Family Together’ dinner at Glass Restaurant in September.

He is an Ambassador for a number of other charities including White Ribbon Foundation, White Balloon Day and Australian Gynaecological Cancer Foundation.

Award-winners BBQ

Cure The Future and Centenary Institute recently celebrated the presentation of two awards with a Barbecue for the staff and families.

The Excellence awards were presented by Professor John Rasko AO and Cure The Future Chairperson Diane Langmack OAM – to Linda Pallot for her work at RPA Hospital and to Dr Ulf Schmitz  for his work at the Centenary Institute.

Cure the Future is committed to the institute in recognising the fantastic work by the staff in finding a cure for our future generations and this is a way of showing our appreciation.

Stem Cell Tourism

Stem Cell Tourism

THE AUSTRALIAN

Stem cell ‘tourists’ flock to Australia

JOHN ROSS THE AUSTRALIAN –  August 5, 2016

Medical tourism based around questionable, potentially dangerous stem cell techniques has migrated from the Third World to the First World, with Australia boasting one of the biggest proliferations of hard-sell clinics.

A global study has found Australia easily surpasses medical tourism hot spots such as Thailand in the number of stem cell practices marketing services directly to customers.

The study, published this morning in the journal Cell Stem Cell, found clinics in developed countries were exploiting regul atory gaps to make “an extraordinary and implausible range of claims for their offerings”.

The news has emerged weeks after a coroner slammed a Sydney cosmetic surgeon’s exper – imental stem cell therapy, which caused the death of Alzheimer’s disease patient Sheila Drysdale, as “quack” medicine.

“People think you’ve got to fly to Russia, The Philippines or somewhere like that to do your stem cell tourism,” said senior auth or John Rasko of the University of Sydney.

“Overwhelmingly, the US has the largest preponderance of these clinics, (and) advanced economies like Australia, Germany and Italy are now offering these dubious procedures.”

Professor Rasko said the study, which tallied clinics offering their services online in English, was easily the biggest of its type. On a per-capita basis, Australia had more clinics than the US: only Ireland, Singapore and the tax havens of the Cayman Islands and Bahamas had more.

Anti-ageing and skincare procedures were the most common therapies offered, but clinics were vague about the types of stem cells being used, with more than half not indicating a source.

In June, news emerged of an American stroke victim developing a tumour in his back after stem cell treatments overseas.

Professor Rasko said more such cases were inevitable. “This is an unfettered industry … not properly regulated and this direct-to-consumer marketing will only get worse unless regulators hear this wake-up call.”

In March, the Australian Academy of Science called for the closing of a regulatory loophole that allows “autologous” stem cell procedures using patients’ own cells.